Migrate Feedback Intake from Productboard
Teams can use Request Mark as the public feedback layer even if internal product planning remains elsewhere. The migration should focus on intake boards, user links, and status communication.
When it helps
Why teams use this
Scattered feedback slows small teams down
startups, indie hackers, SaaS teams, and micro-SaaS builders often hear requests across email, support, calls, chat, and founder replies. Request Mark gives that signal a structured place to live.
Internal tools are not public feedback tools
Delivery tools are useful after a decision is made. A feedback board helps users submit, vote, and follow requests before work becomes an internal ticket.
Visible progress builds trust
Statuses and admin updates help users understand whether a request is new, planned, in progress, shipped, or closed.
What this helps you do
After setup
What improves after setup
A clearer intake path
Teams get one page to share when a customer asks for a feature, instead of manually copying notes into a spreadsheet or backlog.
Better prioritization signals
Votes, comments, requester identity, and status history create a more useful demand picture than memory or gut feel.
A faster path to delivery
When a request has enough signal, the team can move it into Linear, Trello, or the delivery system that owns implementation.
How it works
- 1Identify which customer-facing intake forms or portals are active.
- 2Create Request Mark boards for those intake flows.
- 3Move active requests into the right boards.
- 4Send customers the new board links.
FAQ
Does this require replacing internal product planning?+
No. Request Mark can run as the public feedback layer while internal planning continues in your existing tool.